Ruby Duncalf

17Nov

White Paper Series: Gambling Commission update on deposit limits

17th November 2025 Ruby Duncalf 6

The Gambling Commission has announced further changes to the remote gambling and software technical standards (“RTS”) aiming to improve the gambling management tools available to consumers. From 30 June 2026, all online operators must provide customers with the opportunity to set a ‘deposit limit’ which is based solely on the amount a customer pays into their account over a set duration.

Background

Following the Autumn 2023 consultation, the Gambling Commission announced changes to take effect on 31 October 2025 to strengthen consumer protection in online gambling (“Initial Consultation”). Responses to the Initial Consultation identified inconsistencies with the way operators interpret ‘deposit limits’. The Gambling Commission launched a supplementary consultation in March 2025, setting out proposals for clarifying ‘deposit limits’, and other financial limits in the RTS.

Helen Rhodes, the Gambling Commission’s Director of Major Policy Projects, said in relation to the proposed changes to the RTS:

“Our work will help empower consumers to have greater awareness and control over their gambling. These further changes will also bring consistency and clarity for those consumers choosing to set deposit limits, while still supporting gambling businesses to offer customer choice for different forms of limits.”

Summary of the proposals and new requirements

Proposal 1: Default ‘gross’ deposit limits must be offered to the customer

The proposal was to include a requirement that, as a minimum, ‘gross’ deposit limits must be offered to customers. The intention was to improve consistency across the industry and to simplify the landscape for consumers.

RTS requirement 12B:

As a minimum, the gambling system must offer gross deposit limits – where the amount a customer deposits into their account is limited over a particular duration.
Where more than one type of limit is made available in the gambling system, operators must ensure that ‘gross’ deposit limits are offered to customers with at least equal prominence to other limits.

The following requirements will also be added to RTS 12B, which provide further clarity:

Where a customer sets simultaneous time frames, for example a daily deposit limit and a weekly limit, the most restrictive must always apply. Therefore, if a daily deposit limit of £10 and a weekly limit of £100 are both set then the maximum the system must allow to be deposited is £10 per day and £70 per week.

The gambling system must prevent a customer from further depositing funds once a deposit limit is reached, until the defined period of the limit restarts or the customer takes action to increase the limit (subject to a standard 24 hour cooling off period).

Applies to: all gambling – except subscription lottery.

Proposal 2: The application of the term and definition of deposit limit

The intention of this proposal was to improve clarity for the consumer and consistency across the industry.

RTS requirement 12B: Only limits that meet this definition can be referred to as a deposit limit, and limits meeting this definition must be described to a customer as a deposit limit.

Applies to: all gambling – except subscription lottery.

Proposal 3: Wording of financial limits in the implementation guidance including the introduction of ‘net’ deposit limits

The intention of this proposal was to provide increased consumer choice by amending the implementation guidance to allow for other types of limits should operators choose to make them available.

RTS implementation guidance 12B: In order to maximise consumer choice, operators could also offer:

stake limits: where the amount a customer stakes on gambling (or specific gambling products) is restricted for the period or duration of the limit applied; and/or
loss limits: the total value of stakes placed on gambling products minus the total value of any winnings or returns from those stakes is limited for the period or duration of the limit applied; and/or
net deposit limits: the amount deposited into the account minus any withdrawals made for the period/duration of the limit applied.

Applies to: all gambling – except subscription lottery.

The Gambling Commission has published the amended RTS 12 wording in full including both the changes coming into effect from 30 June 2026 and the changes to RTS that are in effect from 31 October 2025.

Next steps

The new RTS requirements come into force on 30 June 2026. Licensees must adhere to these requirements before this date.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the new deposit limit rules.

24Oct

Reminder: Updates to the RTS and transparency of protection of customer funds come into effect on 31 October 2025

24th October 2025 Ruby Duncalf 25

Licensees are reminded that updates to the remote gambling and software technical standards (“RTS”), along with new requirements regarding the transparency of protection of customer funds, come into effect on 31 October 2025. We previously reported on the upcoming changes he r e, and this post serves as a timely reminder to ensure all licensees are fully prepared for the upcoming changes. Licensees should ensure they are compliant with the requirements before 31 October 2025.

Summary of the RTS updates

Following the Gambling Commission’s response to its Autumn 2023 consultation, amendments to RTS 12 – Financial limits are scheduled to come into effect at the end of the month. These changes will apply across all gambling products, with the exception of subscription lotteries. For ease of reference, we have set out below the RTS 12 in effect from 31 October 2025. Licensees should familiarise themselves with the updated RTS to ensure they are compliant.

RTS requirement 12A

The gambling system must provide easily accessible facilities for customers to set their own financial limits at any time from the point of registration. 

Customers must be prompted to set a limit as part of the registration process or at the point at which the customer makes the first deposit or payment. The limit must be implemented as soon as practicable after the customer’s request. The customer must be informed when the limit will come into force. 

RTS implementation guidance 12A:

Limits could be in the form of:
1. deposit limits: where the amount a customer deposits into their account is limited over a particular duration.
2. spend limits: where the amount a customer spends on gambling (or specific gambling products) is restricted for a given period – this type of limit may be appropriate where the customer does not hold a deposit account with the operator.
3. loss limits: where the amount lost (that is, winnings subtracted from the amount spent) is restricted (for instance when a customer makes a £10 bet and wins £8, the loss is £2).
The period/duration of the limits on offer should include:
1. 24 hours;
2. 7 days; and
3. one month
where a customer sets simultaneous time frames, for example a daily deposit limit and a weekly limit, the lowest limit should always apply. Therefore, if a daily deposit limit of £10 and a weekly limit of £100 are both set then the maximum the system should allow to be deposited is £10 per day and £70 per week.

RTS requirement 12B

Customers must be presented with a ‘free text’ box to set a limit, or the equivalent in the case of telephone gambling. 

As a minimum, limits must be applied at the account level. 

RTS implementation guidance 12B:

In addition to account-level limits, limits could be implemented across individual products or channels. Where gambling licensees offer the facility to set limits for individual products or channels it should be made clear to customers using the facility whether those limits apply at the account or product/channel level. For example, where a limit has been set for a specific game, a customer should not be misled into assuming that the limit automatically applies to other products.
Where a customer sets simultaneous time frames, gambling licensees should provide clear information on how the interaction between those limits works.
Operators could provide links to tools or resources to inform budgeting and aid customers in determining appropriate limits for their personal circumstances.
In order to mitigate against user error, the gambling system could permit specific monetary increments for limits, such as whole pounds.

RTS requirement 12C

Financial limit facilities must be provided via a direct link on the homepage and be clearly visible and accessible. 

Financial limit facilities must be clearly visible and accessible on deposit pages/screens or via a direct link on these pages or screens. 

The gambling system must minimise the number of clicks or pages customers make in order to access financial limit facilities.

RTS implementation guidance 12C: Links to limit-setting facilities from communications such as emails or notifications should link directly to the facilities and not via a home page or other intermediate page(s), unless required by account log in security settings.

RTS requirement 12D

Customer-led limits must only be increased at the customer’s request, only after a cooling-off period of at least 24 hours has elapsed and only once the customer has taken positive action at the end of the cooling off period to confirm their request. 

Unless systems/technical failures prevent it, customer-led reductions to limits must be implemented immediately.  

The gambling system must provide a prompt to customers to review their own account and transaction information, as is currently made available under RTS 1 – Customer account information. This must be provided at a minimum of six-month intervals for accounts with activity within a rolling 12-month period. Customers must be provided with facilities to set more frequent reminders to receive this statement and review their limits. 

RTS implementation guidance 12D:

In the event of systems or technical failure not facilitating an automated and/or immediate reduction in limits, the customer should be informed when the limit reduction will take effect.
Operators should monitor engagement with and responses to alerts, in order to inform good design and best practice.

RTS requirement 12E

Financial limit-setting facilities must present setting a limit as the default choice. The gambling system must require an action by the customer in order to decline setting a limit. 

The gambling system must receive confirmation that the customer does not wish to set a limit before moving on to deposit/gamble. 

The gambling system must prompt existing customers without limits set to review this position as a minimum on an annual basis.

RTS implementation guidance 12E:

Presentation of financial limits as the default option could take the form of pre-selected fields such as tick boxes, or through visual distinction.
Action to decline setting a limit and receiving confirmation could take the form of a tick box, dismissing a message or other action by the customer.
Customers who choose to opt out of setting a limit could be provided with information or links to tools and resources such as budgeting tools and information about safer gambling.

Please note that on 7 October 2025 the Gambling Commission published its response to its supplementary consultation on the definitions of different types of financial limits, which will result in further changes to RTS 12 which will take effect on 30 June 2026.

Summary of update to transparency of customer funds

On 31 October 2025, licence condition 4.2.1 shall be amended with a paragraph added at licence condition 4.2.1(3). Subsequent paragraphs will be renumbered accordingly. The amendment shall apply to all operating licences, with the exception of gaming machine technical standards, gambling software, host, ancillary remote bingo and ancillary remote casino licences.

Under the updated licence condition, licensees who have selected a ‘not protected’ rating (i.e. in the case of a gambling company becoming insolvent, any money in a customer’s account would be classed as part of the company’s assets), will be required to remind customers every six months that their funds are not protected in the event of insolvency. The reminder must refer to the value of funds held for the customer. The licensee must require the customer to acknowledge receipt of the information and must not permit the customer to utilise the funds for gambling until they have done so.

Next steps

Licensees are strongly encouraged to review the revised RTS and implementation guidance in full, and updated licence condition 4.2.1, to ensure all necessary changes are made ahead of the 31 October 2025 implementation date.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the upcoming changes.

10Oct

Gambling Commission publishes update on emerging money laundering and terrorist financing risks

10th October 2025 Ruby Duncalf 36

As part of the Gambling Commission’s ongoing efforts to combat financial crime in the UK gambling sector, its latest emerging risk update (October 2025) highlights the continued and evolving risks posed by pre-payment methods.

This serves as a critical reminder to operators to review their money laundering and terrorist financing (“MLTF”) risk assessments and related policies, procedures and controls.

Why this matters

Under licence condition 12.1.1(3) of the Gambling Commission’s Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice, operators are required to remain informed of emerging MLTF risks, ensuring that such policies, procedures and controls are updated as needed, implemented effectively, and remain effective, taking into account any guidelines published by the Gambling Commission from time to time.

The Gambling Commission’s October 2025 update reinforces earlier emerging risks bulletins published in April 2020 and February 2022 and the Gambling Commission’s 2023 MLTF Risk Assessment, which classified pre-paid payment methods as high risk.

Pre-paid payment methods: Key risk factors

The Gambling Commission considers pre-paid payment methods as high risk due to a variety of factors, including:

Merging of funds – the ability to pre-pay or pre-load using cash and, in some cases cryptoassets either directly or through third party websites.
Anonymity – the anonymous nature of some pre-paid payment methods and lack of traceability.
Credit card circumvention – the ability, in some cases, to pre-pay using credit cards.
Deposits – the open-loop nature of pre-paid methods often do not allow deposits back onto the original card or voucher.

What operators need to do

Update your MLTF risk assessment

In accordance with licence condition 12.1.1, licensees must consider all payment methods in their MLTF risk assessment, including pre-paid cards and pre-paid vouchers. This October 2025 emerging risk bulletin notes that the Gambling Commission’s expectation is that pre-paid payment methods should be treated as high risk, in accordance with the Gambling Commission’s own risk assessment.

Conduct appropriate customer profiling and due diligence checks

The use of pre-paid payment methods must be factored into a customer’s risk profile, and the operator must conduct appropriate due diligence checks. Additional ‘know your customer’ (“KYC”) and source of funds/source of wealth checks are also expected to be conducted by the operator when a customer is identified as presenting a higher risk.

The Gambling Commission reminds operators that they are ultimately responsible for ensuring sufficient customer checks are conducted and that they must not rely on a third party payment processor to conduct such checks on their behalf, or rely on third parties to establish source of funds without scrutiny.

Submit a key event notification (if appropriate)

Licence condition 15.2.1(8) requires operators to submit a key event to the Gambling Commission where there are any changes to the methods by which, and/or the payment processors through which, the licensee accepts payment from customers using their gambling facilities. The Gambling Commission expects such key event notifications to contain the following information as a minimum:

The type of payment method.
The provider.
How the payment method was assessed in the operator’s MLTF risk assessment.

Do not accept payment by credit card

The Gambling Commission reminds licensees that under licence condition 6.1.2(1) they must not accept payment for gambling by credit card, including payments to the licensee made by credit card through a money service business or top up methods for pre-paid cards. Operators must ensure that where pre-paid methods are authorised, they are not used to circumvent this restriction.

Review and update policies and procedures

Licence condition 12.1.1(2) requires that following completion of, and having regard to, the MLTF risk assessment, licensees must ensure that they have appropriate policies, procedures and controls to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. Licensees must therefore ensure that whenever they update their MLTF risk assessments, their anti-money laundering (“AML”) policies, procedures and controls are also reviewed and updated as needed.

Next steps

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions or would like further advice on updating your AML policies and procedures, and sign up to our blog to make sure you receive updates on any emerging MLTF risks.

17Sep

White Paper Series: Payment of the first statutory levy now due

17th September 2025 Ruby Duncalf 67

On 1 September 2025, licensees should have received their first invoice in respect of the Government’s statutory levy. The Gambling Levy Regulations 2025 (“the Regulations”) took effect on 6 April 2025 and introduced a mandated levy on all operating licence holders in Great Britain to fund research, prevention and treatment of gambling harms, which replaces the previous system of RET payments, of which the amount contributed was voluntary.

The Gambling Commission has now provided its guidance on the calculation, collection and payment of the statutory gambling levy (the “Guidance”), which we outline below.

How the statutory levy is calculated

The levy is charged at a set rate ranging from 0.1% to 1.1% of the “leviable amount” (defined in regulations 2(3)-(5) of the Regulations) depending on the licensed activity.

For the majority of operators, the levy is calculated based only on gaming facilities provided to customers in Great Britain (“GB”). For licensees that hold a gambling software licence or are required to hold a licence because they site key remote equipment in GB, the levy is calculated on income deriving from those activities, whether in GB or abroad.

The calculation for the amount owed under the statutory levy is based on the data that licensees provide to the Gambling Commission via their quarterly regulatory returns. The Guidance reminds licensees of their obligation to provide ‘true and correct’ data in their returns, and that any incorrect data submitted would impact the calculation of the amount owed under the levy, and risks licensee non-compliance with the law.

Timing of the statutory levy

The calculation for the first statutory levy period for all licences (except for lottery operating (society) licences) is based on regulatory returns data covering the period July 2024 to March 2025, multiplied by one and one-third. For society lottery licensees, it is based on data for the period 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025.

Going forward, for all licensees, the statutory levy will be calculated on regulatory returns data from April through to the following March. Invoices will be issued annually on 1 September and will be based on the licensee’s activity from the previous financial year.

Payment of statutory Levy

The first invoices were issued to licensees on 1 September 2025 with full payment required before 1 October 2025. Invoices are available in the invoices tab on licensees’ eServices accounts, and payment can be made by GovPay or bank transfer.

Statutory levy payments must be paid in full (they cannot be made in instalments) only after the invoice has been issued, and before 1 October in the relevant year. Payments must be made to the correct bank account, quoting the invoice number in full, and must not be combined with any other payments to the Gambling Commission. If the levy payment does not meet these requirements, there is a risk that it may be returned and the operating licence could be at risk of revocation.

Invoices relating to GB and non-GB activity

For the first statutory levy period, each licensee will receive one combined invoice for all GB activity and a second invoice for non-GB activity, if appropriate. Operators must pay the full amount of the GB activity invoice before 1 October 2025.

In relation to non-GB activity, the Gambling Commission recognises that some operators may have submitted returns that that either do not fully account for leviable foreign income, or include non-leviable foreign income. If a licensee believes that the Gambling Commission’s non-GB invoice includes non-leviable activity from foreign customers, it is the operator’s responsibility to notify the Commission promptly, and in any case before 1 October 2025, and provide full reasons at to why they believe particular sums are not due. The Gambling Commission will suspend enforcement of that element of the levy until the query is solved.

Incorrect invoices

It is the operator’s responsibility to notify the Gambling Commission if its invoices do not include any sums that ought to be brought into account, and to pay the full sums due, including any shortfall. If it fails to do so, the Gambling Commission may take enforcement measures, including revocation of the licence pursuant to section 119 of the Gambling Act 2005.

Operators should notify the Gambling Commission of any such errors by email at [email protected].

Consequences of not paying the statutory levy

Payment of the statutory levy is a licence requirement, and therefore non-payment, or late payment of the levy, by the licensee could result in revocation of the operating licence, unless the Gambling Commission is satisfied that the late or non-payment is due to an administrative error.

Next steps

Licensees can prepare for the statutory levy payment by ensuring:

regulatory returns data is submitted correctly and on time;
they have access to their organisation’s eServices account;
the Gambling Commission holds the correct contact details (i.e. email address) for their organisation; and
payment is only made once an invoice has been received.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the Regulations or payment of the statutory levy.

15Aug

Horizon Scanning: Key Dates for your Diary

15th August 2025 Ruby Duncalf 112

As the implementation of a number of the White Paper proposals continue to take effect, it is essential that licensees and stakeholders are prepared for the upcoming regulatory reforms. This blog sets out the key dates for licensees to be aware of, to avoid falling foul of the forthcoming changes to regulations.

Key dates for your diary

1 October 2025 – Statutory Levy – the first invoices for this year’s statutory levy will be issued from 1 September 2025, with payment required before 1 October 2025. The statutory levy replaces the previous “RET” payments, and is charged to all gambling licensees (if it is more than £10) at a set percentage rate applied to licensees’ regulatory returns. See our previous blog on the statutory levy here. The Gambling Commission will be issuing guidance on how to pay the levy before September.

10 October 2025 – Changes to the Financial Penalties Determination Process – updates to the Gambling Commission’s Statement of principles for determining financial penalties will come into effect on 10 October 2025, strengthening the transparency and consistency of how the Gambling Commission calculates and imposes penalties. For further details of the changes, please see our previous blog.

31 October 2025 –Updates to the RTS – updates to the remote gambling and software technical standards (“RTS”) to enact minor changes to the existing RTS wording, ‘elevating’ some parts of the implementation guidance to requirements and to introduce new requirements and implementation guidance in respect of customer led tools. These changes are summarised in our previous blog.

31 October 2025 – Transparency of Protection of Customer Funds – operators whose customer funds are ‘not protected’ in the event of insolvency must inform the customer at the point of first deposit, and actively remind them once every six months that their funds are not protected. See our previous blog on this topic here.

19 January 2026 – Socially Responsible Incentives (extended from original implementation date of 19 December 2025) – operators will need to comply with the updated requirements which we outlined in our previous blog, and include:

a ban on mixed product promotions,
a cap on wagering requirements of promotional offers to ten and
a reworded LCCP Social Responsibility Code Provision 5.1.1.

Next steps

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the upcoming regulatory changes and sign up to our blog to receive updates on the continued progress of the implementation of the White Paper proposals.

08Aug

Gambling Commission response to OSR review and Gambling Survey for Great Britain

8th August 2025 Ruby Duncalf 102

On 24 July 2025, the Gambling Commission published its review of the Gambling Survey for Great Britain (“GSGB”) and response to the Office for Statistic Regulation (“OSR”) report. The GSGB sets out the Gambling Commission’s official statistics on gambling behaviours in Great Britain, and in our previous blog, we reported on the OSR’s review of the GSGB and their recommendations to the Gambling Commission.

The Gambling Commission’s review reflects on the first year since the publication of the GSGB and how the data is delivering against the Gambling Commission’s aims and expectations. The paper also responds to the OSR’s assessment of the GSGB, and details plans for its ongoing development.

How the GSGB is being used

One aim of the GSGB was for it to be a source of robust data, available to be analysed and used by stakeholders. The Gambling Commission reports that between February 2024 and March 2025, a total of 5,271 users have visited the GSGB pages on the Gambling Commission’s website; the majority of those users are based in the UK, although there has been some international interest as well.

In line with the Gambling Commission’s aim to be open and transparent with GSGB data, the raw data from the GSGB was submitted to the UK Data Service and subsequently published on 19 February 2025. The Gambling Commission recognises that numerous studies and reports have been published that include GSGB data, as well as the GSGB playing “an important role in contributing to policy developments relating to gambling”, including a Parliamentary debate on gambling harms in February 2025.

Response to OSR’s assessment of the GSGB

As discussed in our previous blog, the Gambling Commission asked the OSR to review the GSGB against its standards in the Code of Practice for Statistics. The Gambling Commission addressed the recommendations of the OSR, setting out progress made to date and future intended actions:

Actions in response to Professor Sturgis review

The Gambling Commission reported that since the OSR review, the National Centre for Social Research (“NCSR”), Professor Sturgis and Professor Kuha of the London School of Economics and Political Science have been commissioned to undertake experimental research to implement the recommendations in Professor Sturgis’ independent assessment of the GSGB, published in February 2025. The experimental research is due to be published in Summer 2025 with the second GSGB report scheduled to be published on 2 October 2025, to allow time for feedback to be incorporated into the report.

The survey improvement plan has also been updated to explain that the Gambling Commission will be able to benchmark results from the GSGB against the 2024 Health Survey for England (“HSE”) (once published) and against the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (“APMS”) which was published in June 2025.

Quality assurance

The Gambling Commission sets out that the GSGB data undergoes quality assurance by the NCSR followed by further quality assurance undertaken by the Gambling Commission, as detailed on its website.

The Gambling Commission will shortly be publishing a new research governance framework, which will underpin quality assurance and research quality, and notes the importance of validating data against other sources; for example the GSGB Annual Report 2023 included, for the first time, data on suicidal ideation/attempts and if they were related to gambling, which was validated against the data in the APMS.

The Gambling Commission will update the GSGB technical report to include a section on data validation by October 2025.

Supporting appropriate use

The Gambling Commission has been monitoring the use of GSGB data, and notes that there have been some common mistakes. Within statistical releases, the Gambling Commission will make it clearer to users that the GSGB produces estimates and these estimates are subject to potential biases; also that the negative consequences of gambling may be overestimated.

Based on early feedback from the OSR of the existing GSGB guidance, the Gambling Commission updated its guidance on using statistics from the GSGB in February 2025 to explain what statistics can and cannot be used for, and why. The Gambling Commission also intends to make it easier for users to find this guidance, and adding links to the guidance from the statistical landing pages and the Excel data tables shall be standard practice going forward.

Coherence and comparability

In its guidance, the Gambling Commission cautions against comparing GSGB data against the data from previous surveys, due to differences in study methodology, but acknowledges that such comparisons are nevertheless useful. It notes that the publication of the next APMS and HSE and further recommendations from the Professor Sturgis review (see 1 above) will provide further opportunities to investigate the coherence and comparability of GSGB statistics.

The Gambling Commission will be publishing a new evidence roadmaps framework, together with its research governance framework, scheduled for September 2025.

Engagement and communication

The OSR recommended that the Gambling Commission should implement a user engagement strategy. The Gambling Commission reported on the transition from the previous stakeholder engagement groups into the GSGB Statistics User Group, to enhance communication and engagement with users of the GSGB and allow the exchange of views, ideas and information between users and the Gambling Commission, share research findings and inform the continued development of the GSGB.

Following feedback from the OSR, a dedicated email address has been set up to receive feedback or queries in relation to the GSGB ([email protected]). The Gambling Commission encourages users to get in touch via the dedicated email address, or to provide ongoing feedback via a feedback form or by joining the GSGB Statistics Users Group.

The Gambling Commission also appended to the paper their communications strategy for the ongoing publication of statistics from GSGB.

Accessibility and usability

The Gambling Commission will continue to publish data from the GSGB in a variety of formats accessible on the Gambling Commission’s website, and to the UK Data Service so other researchers can access it. From October 2025, hyperlinks will be incorporated from the contents page to the relevant table of data.

Other post launch GSGB development work

Whilst reviewing the content for the 2025 GSGB questionnaire, the Gambling Commission has added questions on the following topics:

Consumer trust in gambling.
Unlicensed gambling.
Bingo, to understand the locations in which bingo is played in person.
Whether respondents have registered with GAMSTOP.

Next steps

We encourage readers to read the Gambling Commission’s full response to the OSR’s review of the GSGB ahead of the second annual report due to be published in October 2025. Please get in touch with us if you have any questions on the GSGB and sign up to our blog to receive updates on the ongoing development of the GSGB.

Ruby Duncalf

White Paper Series: Gambling Commission update on deposit limits

Reminder: Updates to the RTS and transparency of protection of customer funds come into effect on 31 October 2025

Gambling Commission publishes update on emerging money laundering and terrorist financing risks

White Paper Series: Payment of the first statutory levy now due

Horizon Scanning: Key Dates for your Diary

Gambling Commission response to OSR review and Gambling Survey for Great Britain

Sign up to our blog and get updates from Harris Hagan