Harris Hagan Harris Hagan
  • Home
  • About
  • People
  • Work
    • Gambling
      • Online gaming
      • Land-based gaming
      • Licensing
      • Compliance
      • Enforcement
      • Training
    • Commercial & Corporate
  • Recognition
  • Blog
  • Contact
Harris Hagan

Responsible Gambling

Home / Responsible Gambling
20Feb

Gambling Commission Launches Consultation on the Destination of Future Regulatory Settlements

20th February 2026 James Frudd Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 20

On 5 February 2026, the Gambling Commission opened a consultation on amending section 2.39 of its Statement of Principles for Determining Financial Penalties. The proposal is that future regulatory settlements (payments in lieu of a financial penalty) be paid into the Consolidated Fund, which receives the proceeds of taxation and other government receipts to fund public expenditure. This would align the funding’s destination with financial penalties under the Gambling Act 2005 (the Act).

Background

The regulatory framework provides that the Gambling Commission may impose financial penalties, which are paid to the Consolidated Fund under the Act. The Gambling Commission may also enter into regulatory settlements as an alternative enforcement mechanism. Regulatory settlements, which may involve payments in lieu of a financial penalty, enable the Gambling Commission to reach an appropriate regulatory outcome without initiating a formal licence review.

Currently, the Commission’s Statement of principles for determining financial penalties sets out that payments made in lieu of a financial penalty as part of a regulatory settlement do not need to paid into the Consolidated Fund in the same way as financial penalties. Instead, the Commission has the power to approve the destination of the monies paid as part of a regulatory settlement, which could include returning monies to any identified victims or directing money to charities for socially responsible purposes.

Following the April 2023 White Paper, a statutory levy was introduced and came into force in April 2025. The statutory levy funding is used for the purposes of research, prevention and treatment. In its November 2023 supplementary advice to Government, the Commission identified the need to consider the future destination of regulatory settlement monies in light of the levy and to avoid a dual system.

The proposal

Section 2.39 of the Statement of principles for determining financial penalties to be amended to confirm that payments in lieu of financial penalties are directed to the Consolidated Fund, in the same way as financial penalties.

The proposed wording is as follows:

Payments made in lieu of a financial penalty as part of a regulatory settlement will be paid into the Consolidated Fund in the same way that financial penalties imposed under section 121 of the Act are.

Rationale for the proposal by the Gambling Commission

  1.  Alignment with the levy system

The Gambling Commission explored mirroring settlement flows with the levy’s commissioning structures to avoid duplication. After discussions with Government and levy commissioning bodies, this was deemed not feasible due to the complexity and potential volatility of regulatory settlement funds.

  1.  Avoiding a dual system

Paying settlements into the Consolidated Fund would prevent parallel funding streams or duplication of work being funded by the statutory levy.

  1.  Administrative efficiency

Directing settlements to the Consolidated Fund would facilitate prompt payment and enable Government to determine their use, as is the case for financial penalties.

Next steps

The consultation will run for 8 weeks and will close on Thursday 2 April 2026. Responses can be submitted online or by post to: Policy Team, Gambling Commission, 4th Floor, Victoria Square House, Birmingham, B2 4BP

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the consultation.

Read more
19Feb

Gambling Commission announces new gaming machine rules  

19th February 2026 Ruby Duncalf Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 25

On 29 January 2026, the Gambling Commission announced changes to the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (“LCCP”) ensuring that non-compliant gaming machines are removed from premises quickly and effectively. The changes come into force on 29 July 2026.

What are the new requirements?

In January 2025, the Gambling Commission opened its January 2025 consultation proposing a new general licence condition to simplify the Gambling Commission’s enforcement processes and to ensure that non-complaint machines are removed from the market. The Gambling Commission recently published its consultation response (the “Response”) confirming a new licence condition applicable to all non-remote casino, bingo, betting, adult gaming centre and family entertainment centre operating licences. The following new licence condition shall come into force on 29 July 2026:

18.     Removal of non-compliant gaming machines

18.1.   Removal of non-compliant gaming machines

18.1.1. Removal of non-compliant gaming machines

      1.  Licensees must not make a specified gaming machine available for use in reliance on the licence if the Commission has notified the licensee in writing that the     manufacture, supply, installation, adaption, maintenance or repair of the machine:

a.  was not carried out in reliance on a gaming machine technical operating licence, or

b.  did not comply with the Commission’s gaming machine technical standards.

The written notifications will be sent from the Gambling Commission to the licensee’s primary contact and will clearly outline:

(a)   why the Gambling Commission considers the specified gaming machine(s) to be non-compliant;

(b)   the actions required; and

(c)   the timeline for completion.

The written notification will also clearly identify the “specified gaming machines” in question. The gaming machines would be identified through information such as the machine name, machine manufacturer, machine category and/or premises location. 

In the Response, the Gambling Commission re-iterates that licensees who make gaming machines available for use have existing responsibilities to ensure that the gaming machines offered are compliant with the Gambling Act 2005, LCCP and applicable Regulations.

Next steps

The new licence condition comes into force on 29 July 2026. Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about gaming machine compliance or the new licence condition.

Read more
19Jan

Reminder: Socially responsible incentives come into effect on 19 January 2026 

19th January 2026 Ruby Duncalf Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 65

Licensees are reminded that the changes to Social Responsibility Code Provision (“SRCP”) 5.1.1  came into effect today, 19 January 2026. The changes apply to all licences (including ancillary licences), except gaming machine technical and software licences.

Summary of changes

Further to the Gambling Commission’s Autumn 2023 consultation response, the new promotional rules, as outlined in our previous blog, resulted in three main changes that came into effect today:

  1. Mixed product promotion ban.
  2. Bonus wagering requirements limited to 10.
  3. Rewording SRCP 5.1.1 Rewards and Bonuses section of the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice to read:

Social Responsibility Code 5.1.1 Rewards and Bonuses

 1.   The following applies where a licensee makes available to any customer, or potential customer, an incentive or reward scheme or other arrangement under which a customer may receive money, goods, services or any other advantage (including the discharge in whole or in part of any liability of his) (‘the benefit’).

 2.  Licensees must:

a.   Set out terms and conditions, in relation to an incentive, which are clear, transparent, and fair and readily accessible to any customer or potential customer to whom it was offered.

3.  Licensees must not:

a.   Apply wagering requirements, which requires a customer to play through bonus funds, over a maximum of 10 times. A wagering requirement is where a customer is required to make wagers totalling a particular value for funds to become withdrawable.

b.   Include more than one type of gambling product (betting, casino, bingo, and lottery) within an incentive.

c.   Alter or increase the receipt or the value, or amount of the incentive if the qualifying activity or spend is reached within a shorter time than the whole period over which the benefit is offered.

d.   Construct incentives where, if the benefit comprises of free or subsidised travel or accommodation which encourages the customer’s attendance at a particular licensed premises, it is offered on terms that directly relate to the level of the customer’s prospective gambling.

Guidance on compliant product promotions

The Gambling Commission’s blog ‘Socially responsible incentives: what operators need to know’ published on 12 December 2025 includes helpful guidance on acceptable forms of product promotions following the Gambling Commission’s ban on mixed product promotions that came into force today. In summary, the following are examples of compliant and non-compliant product promotions:

Examples of compliant promotions

    • Promotions that do not mix product types between the initial customer activity and the prize. For example, ‘Bet £5 and get a £10 free bet’.
    • Promotions where the initial customer activity and the prize are both within the same product category. For example, ‘Spend £5 on casino products and get 20 free spins’.
    • Promotions that are construed in a manner that allows the customer to have full freedom of choice in which product category to use credits or bonus money, for example, ‘Bet £5 to get £10 credit or bonus to be used on all products available’.
    • Promotions that allow the customer the freedom to choose which product category they chose to play and the prize or reward is also not limited to product category. For example, ‘Spend £10 on any licensed product of your choice and get £10 credit or bonus to spend on your choice’, or ‘Deposit £5 (not linked to participation of a product category) and get £5 credit or bonus of any licensed product’.

Examples of non-compliant promotions

    • Promotions that mix product types. For example, ‘Bet £5 to get 20 free spins’. This offer invites the customer to participate in one type of gambling activity, to get a prize from a different product category.
    • Promotions that offer a prizes in respect of different products. For example, ‘Bet £5 and get a £5 free bet and 20 free spins’.
    • Promotions that provide the customer with the choice of initial qualifying activity but specify the product category to which the prize is applicable. For example, ‘Spend £10 on any licensed product of your choice and get £5 free bet’.

Next steps

Licensees are encouraged to review the changes to SRCP 5.1.1 to ensure that all necessary changes are made from today, 19 January 2026. Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the socially responsible incentives.  

Read more
22Dec

Department for Culture, Media and Sport publish voluntary Code of Good Practice for prize draw operators

22nd December 2025 Ruby Duncalf Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 84

On 21 November 2025, the Department of Media, Culture and Sport (“DCMS”) published the Voluntary Code of Good Practice for Prize Draw Operators (the “Code”) in Great Britain.  DCMS estimates the annual market value of the prize draw sector to be £1.3 billion with 7.4 million adult participants annually across approximately 400 operators. DCMS recognises that whilst the operation of prize draws does not require a licence under the Gambling Act 2005, research has shown how prize draws sit adjacent to the gambling industry, presenting concerns in light of gambling-related harms. The Code, agreed by the Government and a significant number of prize draw operators, aims to strengthen player protections and ensure that individuals who participate in prize draws do so more safely.

Purpose and scope of the Code

The Code applies to prize draws in Great Britain where:

a)         the outcome (and therefore allocation of prizes) is determined by chance; and

b)         there is both a paid entry route and a free entry route.

The Code outlines key measures that prize draw operators are expected to implement to strengthen player protections and ensure that those who participate in these draws do so more safely. The Code is voluntary, applies only to free-entry draw elements of a business, and does not replace existing regulation and requirements for prize draw operators. Any failure to abide by the Code will not itself constitute a breach of an operator’s legal responsibilities.

Implementation timeline

At the time of writing, the Code has been signed by 141 signatories who have committed to implement the Code in full within 6 months of its publication and not later than 20 May 2026 (“Implementation Date”). Operators becoming a signatory of the Code after the Implementation Date must ensure their full compliance immediately. In the absence of an established industry trade body, signatories are expected to share practices on how to implement measures and work with operators who are not yet signatories to the Code to adopt these measures and subsequently join the Code.

Oversight and compliance

DCMS will have oversight of the Code, reserving the right to delegate oversight to an industry trade body as necessary. DCMS will periodically review the Code’s effectiveness, noting that should the Code not be suitably implemented or complied with, DCMS reserve the right, following consultation, to introduce changes where necessary.

All signatories of the Code have agreed to act in good faith. If concerns arise about non-compliance, these should first be raised with the relevant operator or by contacting DCMS at [email protected].  

The Code

The Code is divided into three core areas: Player Protections, Transparency, and Accountability, each summarised in turn below.

  1. Player protections

a)   Prize draws should only be made available for players aged 18 or over with a reasonable age verification process in place. Advertising should not be targeted at under 18s.
b)   Credit card payments in excess of £250 per month per player should not be accepted.
c)   Suitable proportionate maximum monthly total spends should be set for players or players should be permitted to set their own, including the option to set a limit at £0.
d)   The option to suspend or permanently close an account should be provided to players.
e)   Reasonable efforts should be made to have effective systems and processes in place to monitor player activity to identify harm or potential harm.
f)   Where operators are able to identify any indicators of harm, they should take a tailored and proportionate approach to intervention that mitigates harm and encourages      responsible play.
g)   Operators should signpost players to available support for those experiencing harm.
h)   An appropriate time period should lapse between a prize draw opening and concluding.
i)   Operators should ensure that all marketing and advertising of their prize draws is in line with the CAP and BCAP code, and should be undertaken in a socially responsible manner.

This section of the Code also covers complaints processes, operators’ conduct during a player’s suspension, measures in relation to instant win games, and further requirements regarding marketing and advertising.

  1. Transparency

a)   Operators should provide a clear summary of how each prize draw works, including the statement that prizes are to be awarded by chance.
b)   Promoters of prize draws should ensure that prizes are awarded fairly in accordance with the rules and terms displayed to players, and this should be by (or under the supervision of) an independent person, unless the winners are selected by a computer process that produces verifiably random and auditable results, or by a certified physical drawing machine.
c)   Where possible, prior to entering a draw, operators should provide players with clear and easily accessible information regarding the likelihood of winning a prize and how prizes will be allocated.
d)   Operators should clearly and prominently provide players with details of any “free entry” options for the prize draw before the point of purchase, and in line with the requirements of the Gambling Act 2005.
e)   Operators should promptly provide the winning player with the advertised prize for a draw or a reasonable cash alternative.

This section of the Code also covers charitable contributions and further details regarding free entry options.

  1. Accountability

a)   Operators should have processes in place to monitor and regularly review their own compliance with the Code and, where inadequacies are identified, take swift actions to ensure compliance with the Code.
b)   Operators should take reasonable steps to ensure that all relevant Code requirements are also followed by any third parties that support their prize draw operations, such as affiliate marketers or draw management partners. Where third parties are not compliant with the Code, terminating relationships should be considered.
c)   Operators should engage with other operators to share best practice in relation to player protections, transparency and accountability.
d)   Operators should publish all of the measures they have in place relating to player protections, transparency and accountability, and ensure their adherence with the Code is transparently displayed on their websites.
e)   Operators are encouraged to work with DCMS to ensure the Code remains fit for purpose and share any learnings or challenges.

The full Code and requirements can be found here.

Next steps

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the implementation or compliance with the Code.

Read more
17Dec

Regulators issue joint institutional statement on illegal online gambling

17th December 2025 Ruby Duncalf Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 90

On 25 November 2025, the gambling regulators of Austria, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Portugal and Spain (the “Regulators”) issued a joint institutional statement, calling for stronger measures against illegal online gambling (the “Statement”).

The Statement acknowledges that “illegal online gambling continues to undermine the integrity of regulated markets”, and that “its borderless nature and the speed of technological innovation make it easier for illegal operators to evade regulatory oversight”.

The Regulators expressed their concern at the increasing level of advertising by illegal operators aimed at their jurisdictions. The Statement stressed that advertising disseminated through digital channels, including social media, video platforms and affiliate networks, not only contravenes national legislation but also places citizens, including minors and vulnerable individuals, at heightened risk from illegal gambling activities.  

The Statement follows the Gambling Commission’s heightened effort to understand the illegal gambling market, signified by the publication of its four-part series between September 2025 and November 2025, launched to better understand consumer engagement with illegal online gambling, the associated risks and the actions being taken to disrupt it.

In June 2025, experts at the International Association of Gaming Advisors (IAGA) conference, estimated that in 2024 alone, illegal online gambling represented 71% of total iGaming revenue in all 27 EU states or €80.6bn.

By issuing the Statement, the Regulators wished to highlight their strong commitment to consumer protection, market integrity and compliance with national and international regulations within the respective legal frameworks by:

  • Sharing information on illegal operators between them;
  • Calling on digital platforms and social media networks to strengthen their control mechanisms to prevent the dissemination of advertising content from unauthorised operators; and
  • Reaffirming their commitment to share knowledge and better practices in identifying, investigating, and sanctioning operators acting outside the law.

The Statement ultimately signals a clear message: regulators across Europe are united in their determination to combat illegal online gambling, strengthen the integrity of the regulated gambling sector and to protect citizens from the risks posed by illegal gambling activities.

Next steps

Please get in touch if you have any questions regarding unlicensed gambling in Great Britain, your due diligence obligations, and how to actively monitor your business relationships.

Read more
17Nov

White Paper Series: Gambling Commission update on deposit limits

17th November 2025 Ruby Duncalf Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 119

The Gambling Commission has announced further changes to the remote gambling and software technical standards (“RTS”) aiming to improve the gambling management tools available to consumers. From 30 June 2026, all online operators must provide customers with the opportunity to set a ‘deposit limit’ which is based solely on the amount a customer pays into their account over a set duration.  

Background

Following the Autumn 2023 consultation, the Gambling Commission announced changes to take effect on 31 October 2025 to strengthen consumer protection in online gambling (“Initial Consultation”). Responses to the Initial Consultation identified inconsistencies with the way operators interpret ‘deposit limits’. The Gambling Commission launched a supplementary consultation in March 2025, setting out proposals for clarifying ‘deposit limits’, and other financial limits in the RTS.

Helen Rhodes, the Gambling Commission’s Director of Major Policy Projects, said in relation to the proposed changes to the RTS:

“Our work will help empower consumers to have greater awareness and control over their gambling. These further changes will also bring consistency and clarity for those consumers choosing to set deposit limits, while still supporting gambling businesses to offer customer choice for different forms of limits.”

Summary of the proposals and new requirements   

Proposal 1: Default ‘gross’ deposit limits must be offered to the customer

The proposal was to include a requirement that, as a minimum, ‘gross’ deposit limits must be offered to customers. The intention was to improve consistency across the industry and to simplify the landscape for consumers.

RTS requirement 12B:

  1. As a minimum, the gambling system must offer gross deposit limits – where the amount a customer deposits into their account is limited over a particular duration.
  2. Where more than one type of limit is made available in the gambling system, operators must ensure that ‘gross’ deposit limits are offered to customers with at least equal prominence to other limits.

The following requirements will also be added to RTS 12B, which provide further clarity:

Where a customer sets simultaneous time frames, for example a daily deposit limit and a weekly limit, the most restrictive must always apply. Therefore, if a daily deposit limit of £10 and a weekly limit of £100 are both set then the maximum the system must allow to be deposited is £10 per day and £70 per week.

The gambling system must prevent a customer from further depositing funds once a deposit limit is reached, until the defined period of the limit restarts or the customer takes action to increase the limit (subject to a standard 24 hour cooling off period).

Applies to: all gambling – except subscription lottery.

Proposal 2: The application of the term and definition of deposit limit

The intention of this proposal was to improve clarity for the consumer and consistency across the industry.

RTS requirement 12B: Only limits that meet this definition can be referred to as a deposit limit, and limits meeting this definition must be described to a customer as a deposit limit.

Applies to: all gambling – except subscription lottery.

Proposal 3: Wording of financial limits in the implementation guidance including the introduction of ‘net’ deposit limits  

The intention of this proposal was to provide increased consumer choice by amending the implementation guidance to allow for other types of limits should operators choose to make them available.

RTS implementation guidance 12B: In order to maximise consumer choice, operators could also offer:

  1. stake limits: where the amount a customer stakes on gambling (or specific gambling products) is restricted for the period or duration of the limit applied; and/or
  2. loss limits: the total value of stakes placed on gambling products minus the total value of any winnings or returns from those stakes is limited for the period or duration of the limit applied; and/or
  3. net deposit limits: the amount deposited into the account minus any withdrawals made for the period/duration of the limit applied.

Applies to: all gambling – except subscription lottery.

The Gambling Commission has published the amended RTS 12 wording in full including both the changes coming into effect from 30 June 2026 and the changes to RTS that are in effect from 31 October 2025.

Next steps

The new RTS requirements come into force on 30 June 2026. Licensees must adhere to these requirements before this date.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the new deposit limit rules.

Read more
10Nov

Gambling Commission concludes its series on illegal online gambling

10th November 2025 Ting Fung Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 118

On 6 November 2025, the Gambling Commission published the final report in its four-part series on illegal gambling. The series, which launched in September 2025, aims to understand consumer engagement with illegal online gambling, the associated risks posed and the actions being taken to disrupt it, and has thus far addressed:  

  • Part 1: Consumer awareness, drivers and motivations
  • Part 2: Consumer engagement and trends
  • Part 3: Disruption of illegal online gambling

The final report, titled ‘Challenges of estimating the size of the illegal online gambling market’,  explores the challenges of quantifying an activity that is, by its nature, hidden. Chief Executive, Andrew Rhodes states that:

“Illegal online gambling remains a serious threat to consumers and to the integrity of the regulated market. While measuring the full scale of the problem is complex, our understanding is growing — and so too is our ability to disrupt illegal operators.”

Challenges to understanding, progress building and shared responsibility

The final report notes the continuing significant methodological challenges of measuring the scale of the illegal online gambling market but also, that although no single estimate of market size has been published, the Gambling Commission has nevertheless, developed a stronger evidence base and clearer understanding of both consumer behaviour and illegal operator tactics. The Gambling Commission emphasises that tackling illegal gambling requires a coordinated response and continued collaboration across government, industry and digital platforms.

Next steps

The Gambling Commission will continue its programme of research, data collection and enforcement activity on illegal gambling, which it identifies as a ‘key strategic priority’ and will provide updates accordingly as it progresses. Annex A of the final report outlines a summary of next steps to improve the reliability of estimates, including options for new sources of data and evidence, alongside an assessment of whether these options will satisfactorily fill key information gaps.

Read more
28Oct

DCMS Consultation on Category D gaming machines and licensing for bingo premises

28th October 2025 Ting Fung Harris Hagan, Responsible Gambling, Uncategorised 109

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport opened its consultation on Category D gaming machines and licensing for bingo premises on 15 October 2025.

Consultation proposals

The aim of the consultation is to ensure that the regulatory framework is fit for purpose, with the proposals addressing:

  • Stakes and prizes for Category D machines

For non-money prize machines, Government is proposing to split the “non-money prize machine” category into two; one for “non-money prize, slot style” machines, which maintain the current 30p stake limit and a £8 non-money prize limit, and one for “non-money prize, non-slot style” machines with a stake limit of up to 50p and non-money prize limits of up to £20. Other proposed changes include creation of a new pusher subcategory of machines, an increased non-money prize limit from £50 to £75 for crane-grabs and an increased stake limit from 20p to 30p for coin pushers.

  • Age limit for ‘cash out’ slot style machines

The consultation includes the proposal to make it an offence to invite, cause or permit anyone under 18 to use ‘cash out’ slot-style Category D machines, as set out in the previous government’s response to its consultation on measures relating to the land-based sector.

In respect of the voluntary agreement implemented by Bacta members in 2021 to ban under 18s using adult-only gaming machines, Government proposes to move this agreement into legislation to cover the minority of family entertainment centres not already complying with Bacta’s age restriction agreement.

  • Bingo licensing

The key proposal relates to the establishment of a ‘bingo area’ in all licensed bingo premises to help create a clearer distinction between adult gaming centres and bingo premises, and to ensure that land-based gambling premises are appropriately licensed. The consultation proposes three options for the amount of floor space in licensed bingo premises that should be designated as a continuous bingo area – either a 30, 40 or 50 percent minimum (it is Government’s view that requiring a proportion of floor space greater than 50 percent of the venue could be disproportionately burdensome for some small bingo venues.).

Government is also seeking views on rules that could apply to a ‘bingo area’, including prohibiting cabinet and in-fill style gaming machines in a ‘bingo area’, the type of content that can be included on electronic bino terminals in the ‘bingo area’, and requiring a minimum number of positions for bingo in the ‘bingo area’.

Participants may respond online or email their responses to the consultation questions to [email protected]. The consultation closes at 11:59pm on 9 January 2026.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Read more
08Aug

Gambling Commission response to OSR review and Gambling Survey for Great Britain  

8th August 2025 Ruby Duncalf Responsible Gambling 146

On 24 July 2025, the Gambling Commission published its review of the Gambling Survey for Great Britain (“GSGB”) and response to the Office for Statistic Regulation (“OSR”) report. The GSGB sets out the Gambling Commission’s official statistics on gambling behaviours in Great Britain, and in our previous blog, we reported on the OSR’s review of the GSGB and their recommendations to the Gambling Commission.

The Gambling Commission’s review reflects on the first year since the publication of the GSGB and how the data is delivering against the Gambling Commission’s aims and expectations. The paper also responds to the OSR’s assessment of the GSGB, and details plans for its ongoing development.

How the GSGB is being used

One aim of the GSGB was for it to be a source of robust data, available to be analysed and used by stakeholders. The Gambling Commission reports that between February 2024 and March 2025, a total of 5,271 users have visited the GSGB pages on the Gambling Commission’s website; the majority of those users are based in the UK, although there has been some international interest as well.

In line with the Gambling Commission’s aim to be open and transparent with GSGB data, the raw data from the GSGB was submitted to the UK Data Service and subsequently published on 19 February 2025. The Gambling Commission recognises that numerous studies and reports have been published that include GSGB data, as well as the GSGB playing “an important role in contributing to policy developments relating to gambling”, including a Parliamentary debate on gambling harms in February 2025.

Response to OSR’s assessment of the GSGB

As discussed in our previous blog, the Gambling Commission asked the OSR to review the GSGB against its standards in the Code of Practice for Statistics. The Gambling Commission addressed the recommendations of the OSR, setting out progress made to date and future intended actions:

  1. Actions in response to Professor Sturgis review

The Gambling Commission reported that since the OSR review, the National Centre for Social Research (“NCSR”), Professor Sturgis and Professor Kuha of the London School of Economics and Political Science have been commissioned to undertake experimental research to implement the recommendations in Professor Sturgis’ independent assessment of the GSGB, published in February 2025. The experimental research is due to be published in Summer 2025 with the second GSGB report scheduled to be published on 2 October 2025, to allow time for feedback to be incorporated into the report.

The survey improvement plan has also been updated to explain that the Gambling Commission will be able to benchmark results from the GSGB against the 2024 Health Survey for England (“HSE”) (once published) and against the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (“APMS”) which was published in June 2025.

  1. Quality assurance

The Gambling Commission sets out that the GSGB data undergoes quality assurance by the NCSR followed by further quality assurance undertaken by the Gambling Commission, as detailed on its website.

The Gambling Commission will shortly be publishing a new research governance framework, which will underpin quality assurance and research quality, and notes the importance of validating data against other sources; for example the GSGB Annual Report 2023 included, for the first time, data on suicidal ideation/attempts and if they were related to gambling, which was validated against the data in the APMS.

The Gambling Commission will update the GSGB technical report to include a section on data validation by October 2025.

  1. Supporting appropriate use

The Gambling Commission has been monitoring the use of GSGB data, and notes that there have been some common mistakes.  Within statistical releases, the Gambling Commission will make it clearer to users that the GSGB produces estimates and these estimates are subject to potential biases; also that the negative consequences of gambling may be overestimated.

Based on early feedback from the OSR of the existing GSGB guidance, the Gambling Commission updated its guidance on using statistics from the GSGB in February 2025 to explain what statistics can and cannot be used for, and why. The Gambling Commission also intends to make it easier for users to find this guidance, and adding links to the guidance from the statistical landing pages and the Excel data tables shall be standard practice going forward.

  1. Coherence and comparability

In its guidance, the Gambling Commission cautions against comparing GSGB data against the data from previous surveys, due to differences in study methodology, but acknowledges that such comparisons are nevertheless useful. It notes that the publication of the next APMS and HSE and further recommendations from the Professor Sturgis review (see 1 above) will provide further opportunities to investigate the coherence and comparability of GSGB statistics. 

The Gambling Commission will be publishing a new evidence roadmaps framework, together with its research governance framework, scheduled for September 2025.

  1. Engagement and communication

The OSR recommended that the Gambling Commission should implement a user engagement strategy. The Gambling Commission reported on the transition from the previous stakeholder engagement groups into the GSGB Statistics User Group, to enhance communication and engagement with users of the GSGB and allow the exchange of views, ideas and information between users and the Gambling Commission, share research findings and inform the continued development of the GSGB.

Following feedback from the OSR, a dedicated email address has been set up to receive feedback or queries in relation to the GSGB ([email protected]). The Gambling Commission encourages users to get in touch via the dedicated email address, or to provide ongoing feedback via a feedback form or by joining the GSGB Statistics Users Group.

The Gambling Commission also appended to the paper their communications strategy for the ongoing publication of statistics from GSGB.

  1. Accessibility and usability

The Gambling Commission will continue to publish data from the GSGB in a variety of formats accessible on the Gambling Commission’s website, and to the UK Data Service so other researchers can access it. From October 2025, hyperlinks will be incorporated from the contents page to the relevant table of data.

Other post launch GSGB development work

Whilst reviewing the content for the 2025 GSGB questionnaire, the Gambling Commission has added questions on the following topics:

  • Consumer trust in gambling.
  • Unlicensed gambling.
  • Bingo, to understand the locations in which bingo is played in person.
  • Whether respondents have registered with GAMSTOP. 

Next steps

We encourage readers to read the Gambling Commission’s full response to the OSR’s review of the GSGB ahead of the second annual report due to be published in October 2025. Please get in touch with us if you have any questions on the GSGB and sign up to our blog to receive updates on the ongoing development of the GSGB.

Read more
11Apr

White Paper Series: Gambling Commission publishes statutory levy guidance

11th April 2025 Harris Hagan Responsible Gambling 191

On 7 April 2025, the Gambling Commission published its guidance on the statutory levy and how licensees can prepare for it. The Gambling Levy Regulations 2025 (the “Levy Regulations”) took effect on 6 April 2025 and introduced a mandated levy on all operating licence holders in Great Britain to fund research, prevention and treatment of gambling harms. Please refer to our previous blog, White Paper Series: Statutory Instrument published for statutory levy, for further details of the Levy Regulations.

The Gambling Commission’s guidance sets out snapshot information on the statutory levy, including:

  1. Who will collect the statutory levy

The Gambling Commission collects the levy on behalf of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

  1. Who must pay the statutory levy

The levy will be charged to all gambling licensees. However, licensees are not required to pay the levy where the amount of that levy is £10 or less (for a given period).

  1. How the statutory levy is calculated

The levy will be charged at a set rate for all Gambling Commission licence holders, ranging from 0.1% – 1.1%.

The basis and rate to be paid will vary depending on the licensed product (see the statutory levy rates by licence product table). The basis will be from the following list, as appropriate:

  • Gross Gambling Yield
  • proceeds retained after good causes and prizes paid out
  • gross value of sales or any amounts that will otherwise accrue to the licensee in connection with activities authorised by the licence.

The calculation for the amount owed under the statutory levy is based on the data that licensees provide via Regulatory Returns. The guidance reminds licensees of their obligation to provide ‘true and correct’ data, and any incorrect data submitted would impact the calculation of the amount owed by levy.

  1. When licensees need to pay

Licensees must not pay the statutory levy until they receive their invoice.

The first invoices will be issued on 1 September 2025, with payment required on or before 1 October 2025.

The levy will then be invoiced annually on 1 September and will cover the period of 12 months beginning with 1 April.  

  1. How to pay the statutory levy

Invoices will be issued to licensees by email (not via eServices) and payment can be made using GovPay or Bank Transfer.

Statutory levy payments must be paid in full by 1 October, and in line with the details on the invoice. Full details of how to make the payments will be provided by the Gambling Commission before September 2025.

  1. Consequences of not paying the statutory levy

Payment of the statutory levy is a licence requirement, and therefore non-payment, or late payment, of the levy by the licensee will result in revocation of the operating licence. 

  1. Removal of voluntary RET Contributions

Following the announcement of the introduction of the statutory levy, the Gambling Commission responded to the consultation proposing to amend the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice to remove the requirement for licensees to make a voluntary annual financial contribution to one or more organisation.

Accordingly, as of 31 March 2025, licensees are no longer required to make annual financial contributions to research, prevention and treatment due to the levy’s introduction.

Next steps

Licensees can prepare for the statutory levy payment by ensuring:

  • regulatory returns data is submitted correctly and on time,
  • the Gambling Commission holds the correct contact details (i.e. email address) for your organisation, and
  • payment is only made once an invoice has been received.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the Levy Regulations or the Gambling Commission’s guidance on the statutory levy.

Read more
    123…9
in
Harris Hagan uses cookies to enhance your experience on our website. Please see our Cookie Policy for more information about the cookies and how to disable them. By continuing to use our website without disabling cookies, you agree to our use of cookies.