Licensees are reminded that updates to the remote gambling and software technical standards (“RTS”), along with new requirements regarding the transparency of protection of customer funds, come into effect on 31 October 2025. We previously reported on the upcoming changes here, and this post serves as a timely reminder to ensure all licensees are fully prepared for the upcoming changes. Licensees should ensure they are compliant with the requirements before 31 October 2025.

Summary of the RTS updates

Following the Gambling Commission’s response to its Autumn 2023 consultation, amendments to RTS 12 – Financial limits are scheduled to come into effect at the end of the month. These changes will apply across all gambling products, with the exception of subscription lotteries. For ease of reference, we have set out below the RTS 12 in effect from 31 October 2025. Licensees should familiarise themselves with the updated RTS to ensure they are compliant.

RTS requirement 12A

The gambling system must provide easily accessible facilities for customers to set their own financial limits at any time from the point of registration. 

Customers must be prompted to set a limit as part of the registration process or at the point at which the customer makes the first deposit or payment. The limit must be implemented as soon as practicable after the customer’s request. The customer must be informed when the limit will come into force. 

RTS implementation guidance 12A:

1. Limits could be in the form of:
   1. deposit limits: where the amount a customer deposits into their account is limited over a particular duration.
   2. spend limits: where the amount a customer spends on gambling (or specific gambling products) is restricted for a given period – this type of limit may be appropriate where the customer does not hold a deposit account with the operator.
   3. loss limits: where the amount lost (that is, winnings subtracted from the amount spent) is restricted (for instance when a customer makes a £10 bet and wins £8, the loss is £2).
2. The period/duration of the limits on offer should include:
   1. 24 hours;
   2. 7 days; and
   3. one month
3. where a customer sets simultaneous time frames, for example a daily deposit limit and a weekly limit, the lowest limit should always apply. Therefore, if a daily deposit limit of £10 and a weekly limit of £100 are both set then the maximum the system should allow to be deposited is £10 per day and £70 per week.

RTS requirement 12B

Customers must be presented with a ‘free text’ box to set a limit, or the equivalent in the case of telephone gambling. 

As a minimum, limits must be applied at the account level. 

RTS implementation guidance 12B:

1. In addition to account-level limits, limits could be implemented across individual products or channels. Where gambling licensees offer the facility to set limits for individual products or channels it should be made clear to customers using the facility whether those limits apply at the account or product/channel level. For example, where a limit has been set for a specific game, a customer should not be misled into assuming that the limit automatically applies to other products.
2. Where a customer sets simultaneous time frames, gambling licensees should provide clear information on how the interaction between those limits works.
3. Operators could provide links to tools or resources to inform budgeting and aid customers in determining appropriate limits for their personal circumstances.
4. In order to mitigate against user error, the gambling system could permit specific monetary increments for limits, such as whole pounds.

RTS requirement 12C

Financial limit facilities must be provided via a direct link on the homepage and be clearly visible and accessible. 

Financial limit facilities must be clearly visible and accessible on deposit pages/screens or via a direct link on these pages or screens. 

The gambling system must minimise the number of clicks or pages customers make in order to access financial limit facilities.

RTS implementation guidance 12C: Links to limit-setting facilities from communications such as emails or notifications should link directly to the facilities and not via a home page or other intermediate page(s), unless required by account log in security settings.

RTS requirement 12D

Customer-led limits must only be increased at the customer’s request, only after a cooling-off period of at least 24 hours has elapsed and only once the customer has taken positive action at the end of the cooling off period to confirm their request. 

Unless systems/technical failures prevent it, customer-led reductions to limits must be implemented immediately.  

The gambling system must provide a prompt to customers to review their own account and transaction information, as is currently made available under RTS 1 – Customer account information. This must be provided at a minimum of six-month intervals for accounts with activity within a rolling 12-month period. Customers must be provided with facilities to set more frequent reminders to receive this statement and review their limits. 

RTS implementation guidance 12D:

1. In the event of systems or technical failure not facilitating an automated and/or immediate reduction in limits, the customer should be informed when the limit reduction will take effect.
2. Operators should monitor engagement with and responses to alerts, in order to inform good design and best practice.

RTS requirement 12E

Financial limit-setting facilities must present setting a limit as the default choice. The gambling system must require an action by the customer in order to decline setting a limit. 

The gambling system must receive confirmation that the customer does not wish to set a limit before moving on to deposit/gamble. 

The gambling system must prompt existing customers without limits set to review this position as a minimum on an annual basis.

RTS implementation guidance 12E:

1. Presentation of financial limits as the default option could take the form of pre-selected fields such as tick boxes, or through visual distinction.
2. Action to decline setting a limit and receiving confirmation could take the form of a tick box, dismissing a message or other action by the customer.
3. Customers who choose to opt out of setting a limit could be provided with information or links to tools and resources such as budgeting tools and information about safer gambling.

Please note that on 7 October 2025 the Gambling Commission published its response to its supplementary consultation on the definitions of different types of financial limits, which will result in further changes to RTS 12 which will take effect on 30 June 2026.

Summary of update to transparency of customer funds

On 31 October 2025, licence condition 4.2.1 shall be amended with a paragraph added at licence condition 4.2.1(3). Subsequent paragraphs will be renumbered accordingly. The amendment shall apply to all operating licences, with the exception of gaming machine technical standards, gambling software, host, ancillary remote bingo and ancillary remote casino licences.

Under the updated licence condition, licensees who have selected a ‘not protected’ rating (i.e. in the case of a gambling company becoming insolvent, any money in a customer’s account would be classed as part of the company’s assets), will be required to remind customers every six months that their funds are not protected in the event of insolvency. The reminder must refer to the value of funds held for the customer. The licensee must require the customer to acknowledge receipt of the information and must not permit the customer to utilise the funds for gambling until they have done so.

Next steps

Licensees are strongly encouraged to review the revised RTS and implementation guidance in full, and updated licence condition 4.2.1, to ensure all necessary changes are made ahead of the 31 October 2025 implementation date.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the upcoming changes.

On 17 April 2025, the Gambling Commission issued an industry warning notice to licensees regarding timely submission of regulatory returns. The warning follows a series of fines issued against licensees who have failed to submit a regulatory return by the deadline, and reminds licensees that they face regulatory action if they fail to complete or submit regulatory returns on time.

The industry warning notice notes that since October 2024, more than 10 businesses have been fined up to £750 for not correctly completing and submitting regulatory returns within the required timeframe.

John Pierce, the Gambling Commission’s Director of Enforcement, said:

“Despite early engagement and the issuing of advice notices, further failures to comply with the regulatory returns process were identified in these cases. Operators are expected to understand their reporting obligations and must ensure returns are submitted on time via our online portal.”

“Repeated breaches and persistent non-compliance is likely to result in escalating enforcement action.”

We take this opportunity to remind licensees of the key requirements for regulatory returns.

Requirement of submission

On 1 July 2024, licence condition 15.3.1 of the Licence Conditions Codes of Practice was updated to require all licensees to submit accurate regulatory returns on a quarterly basis, and to align the reporting periods as follows:

• Quarter one – 1 April to 30 June
• Quarter two – 1 July to 30 September
• Quarter three – 1 October to 31 December
• Quarter four – 1 January to 31 March.

All returns must be submitted within 28 days of the end of the quarterly period.  If a licensee has ceased trading in a licensed activity, or has not yet started to trade but still holds a valid licence at the time a return is due, it must submit a ‘nil’ return. A separate return must be submitted for each licence type. 

The next due date

The next quarterly regulatory returns are due by 28 April 2025.

How to submit

Regulatory returns need to be submitted via the eServices digital service on the Gambling Commission’s website.

Late or inaccurate regulatory returns

Under section 342 of the Gambling Act 2005, a licensee commits an offence if it misrepresents or fails to reveal information that it is asked to provide, unless it has a reasonable excuse. The Gambling Commission may prosecute licensees which provide information which is false or deliberately misleading.  Where returns are submitted late, are incomplete or inaccurate, the Gambling Commission will contact the licensee. If the licensee does not submit an up-to-date, accurate regulatory return after the Gambling Commission has contacted them, there is a risk that the Gambling Commission will refer the matter to its Enforcement Team.

Next steps

We encourage licensees to set reminders to submit their regulatory returns on time, and ensure the accuracy of their returns. Further information on regulatory returns can be found in the Gambling Commission’s regulatory returns guidance and published updates on the changes to regulatory returns effective 1 July 2024.

Please get in contact with us if you have any questions about your regulatory returns or if you would like assistance with any compliance or enforcement matters.

In December 2020, the Gambling Commission launched a consultation on proposals to change the way it collects data about adult gambling participation and problem gambling prevalence. Since then, the Gambling Commission has been developing a “single, gold standard population survey for the whole of Great Britain”, in an effort to improve the quality, robustness and timeliness of its official statistics.

Following two years of pilot surveys, stakeholder engagement, interim findings reports and fieldwork conducted by the National Centre for Social Research (“NatCen”), an independent not-for-profit organisation and registered charity, and the University of Glasgow, on 23 November 2023, the Gambling Commission published the first “experimental” statistics of the Gambling Survey of Great Britain (“GSGB”). Thus begins the roll-out of, as the Gambling Commission’s CEO Andrew Rhodes recently described it in a two-part podcast discussion with The Gambling Files, the “largest survey in the world of its kind, on gambling behaviours, attitudes, participation”.

In this blog, we discuss the background to the GSGB, its current status in light of the recent announcement, and why the GSGB is such an important project for the gambling industry in Great Britain.

What is the GSGB?

Background

Prior to the Gambling Commission’s December 2020 consultation, the GSGB was foreshadowed in the Gambling Commission’s Business plan 2020-2021, where the Gambling Commission stated, in connection with its key strategic priority to prevent gambling harm to consumers and the public, it would “review approach to measuring participation and prevalence and publish conclusions”.

As noted above, the December 2020 consultation on gambling participation and problem gambling prevalence research was subsequently launched, which included proposals to change the Gambling Commission’s research methodology to, amongst other things, consolidate the different surveys the Gambling Commission previously relied upon to understand adult gambling participation and prevalence into one population survey, and improve the frequency and turnaround time of the survey data. The response to the consultation, when it was published, confirmed that respondents largely supported these proposals, with an average of two-thirds of respondents agreeing with the proposals to change the research methodology and only one-fifth of respondents disagreeing.

In the meantime, the Gambling Commission had been conducting quarterly telephone surveys on participation and prevalence of problem gambling (the most recent results of which were published on 11 May 2023). However, it was noted by the Government in the White Paper that the telephone survey was “less robust” than the national health surveys of Great Britain in its tracking of gambling trends, and that there are gaps in the evidence and the Government’s understanding of gambling participation and prevalence of harm. This criticism reflected conclusions we had also reached in our joint blog with Regulus Partners on the topic of in-play betting.

It was thus clear, from an industry, regulatory and Governmental perspective, that there was a need for the Gambling Commission to revamp its methodology for the collection of gambling data. In light of the release of the experimental figures, the Gambling Commission’s continued roll-out of the GSGB will be closely followed by the industry.

How is the GSGB carried out?

NatCen describes the GSGB as a survey that asks individuals for their “views on and experiences of playing different games, lotteries and betting, and the effects that these activities may or may not have on people’s lives.” It explains that the GSGB will provide the Gambling Commission with high-quality information about the gaming, betting and playing habits, attitudes and harms experienced across the adult population in Great Britain.

In terms of the specific methodology, the GSGB will be an annual “push to web” survey of up to two adults per household in Great Britain. The Gambling Commission hopes that the GSGB will collect responses from 20,000 individuals each year.

Procedure

NatCen explains that survey invitation letters have been sent to addresses selected at random from the Postcode Address File. In these invitations, NatCen asks that up to two adults in each household take part in the survey online by either:

1. scanning one of the QR codes provided in the survey invitation letter; or
2. visiting the webpage (survey.natcen.ac.uk/GSGB2) and entering one of the unique access codes provided in the survey invitation letter.

Participants will be asked a series of questions that should take approximately 20 minutes to complete. As a reward for taking part, those who complete the GSGB will receive a £10 shopping e-voucher.

Further information about the GSGB and the procedure can be found on NatCen’s website. 

Timeline

The Gambling Commission has published a timeline tracking the progress of the GSGB since its December 2020 consultation. This displays the various stages of the Gambling Commission and NatCen’s progress, such as the consultation, stakeholder engagement, pilot testing and interim reporting on the GSGB project.

Release of experimental statistics

What are the findings?

The findings are (in the Gambling Commission’s words) “not yet fully developed and are still under evaluation”.  In the Gambling Commission’s blog announcing the update, Helen Bryce, Head of Statistics at the Gambling Commission, explained that the findings are from the “final step in the experimental stage of the project”, and have been published so users (i.e. industry stakeholders) can familiarise themselves with the GSGB’s methods and findings before they become the Gambling Commission’s official statistics.

On our initial review, we note the experimental data was based on a sample group of approximately 4,000 (up to 3,774) respondents and presents some interesting key findings:

• 50% of respondents (of which 53% were male and 47% female) had gambled in the past 4 weeks, whereas 61% of respondents had gambled in the last 12 months.
• The three most popular gambling activities in the past 4 weeks were the National Lottery (32%), charity lotteries (15%) and National lottery scratchcards (13%).
• Most gambling respondents indicated they had gambled for the chance of winning big money (84%) and because it is fun (72%).
• 2.5% of respondents were considered to be problem gamblers, having scored 8 or higher on the Problem Gambling Severity Index (“PGSI”) screen, and a further 3.5% of respondents were considered moderate-risk gamblers (scoring between 3-7 on the PGSI screen).

Ms Bryce explained in the Gambling Commission’s blog, due to the significant changes in its methodology for collecting this data, these results should not be compared to previous figures sourced from its quarterly telephone surveys or NHS health surveys. Generally speaking this is a reasonable point of clarification to make, but it is made in a clear effort to dampen industry outcry to the alarming increase in the problem gambling rates: as at March 2023, the overall headline problem gambling rate (measured by the PGSI screen) was “statistically stable” at 0.3%. 

The Gambling Commission has also set out its views on the strengths and limitations of the GSGB methodology. Notably, it has reiterated that although the experimental sample size was approximately 4,000 respondents, the Gambling Commission still expects to gather data from 20,000 respondents annually when it moves to the official statistics phase.

The findings, which are set out in an easily navigated spreadsheet, can be downloaded here. The Gambling Commission is also seeking industry feedback on the GSGB, which can be submitted through its online form.

Current status of the GSGB

The Gambling Commission has recruited Professor Patrick Sturgis, Professor of Quantitative Social Science at the London School of Economics, to undertake an independent review of the GSGB methodology. Professor Sturgis’ findings and recommendations will be published by the Gambling Commission “early next year”, with a view to the GSGB methodology becoming the Gambling Commission’s official statistics “later in 2024”.

The Gambling Commission’s previous update on the GSGB came in a blog from July this year. Having hosted panel workshops with three stakeholder engagement groups (academics, representatives from the gambling industry and individuals with lived experience), the Gambling Commission stated that it intended to publish the first set of quarterly official statistics in Spring 2024, alongside a timeline for future quarterly release dates. With the Gambling Commission seeking an independent review of the GSGB’s methodology, it now appears that the Gambling Commission will not adopt the results of the GSGB as its official statistics until later next year.

Why is the GSGB important?

The Gambling Commission has a duty to advise the Secretary of State on: (a) the incidence of gambling; (b) the manner in which gambling is carried on; (c) the effects of gambling; and (d) the regulation of gambling (see section 26(1) of the Gambling Act 2005).

NatCen explains that the information collected by the GSGB will help the Gambling Commission to fulfil this duty by being “written up in reports for policy makers to use in their decision-making process” so it may be used to “inform policy changes in the gaming, betting and playing industry”.

Furthermore, in its Evidence gaps and priorities 2023 to 2026, published on 23 May 2023, the Gambling Commission confirmed it would be using the GSGB to:

1. improve its understanding of gambling participation at a national level and in sub-groups of interest;
2. produce robust statistics on who is experiencing gambling-relating harms, and how; and
3. develop its understanding of how people commit crime or are a victim of crime as a dimension of gambling-related harm.

The quarterly statistics from the GSGB will thus underpin the Gambling Commission’s future decisions about how it can better protect consumers and carry out its regulatory duties.

Of note for online B2Cs, problem gambling prevalence statistics are also referenced in the Gambling Commission’s new remote customer interaction guidance (about which we have written previously). This guidance addresses, among other things, how remote licensees can comply with the requirement under social responsibility code provision 3.4.3(14) of the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice to “take account of problem gambling rates for the relevant gambling activity as published by the Commission, in order to check whether the number of customer interactions is, at a minimum, in line with this level”, which came into effect from 12 September 2022. 

Licensees should familiarise themselves with the experimental findings, as the Gambling Commission intends. It is, in effect, a warning: Licensees should understand how to interpret the findings of the GSGB and carefully consider these results for when they become the Gambling Commission’s official statistics. Licensees should use this data to inform the minimum levels of customer interactions they are making with customers – or risk enforcement action by the Gambling Commission for not complying with a condition of their operating licence.

Summary

Following criticism of its prior methods for collecting industry statistics, the Gambling Commission appears to be building a robust research methodology to ensure the GSGB will produce its gold standard population survey for the whole of Great Britain. The latest problem gambling rates collected by the GSGB (albeit ‘experimental’) have indeed attracted further scrutiny from the industry – some may argue that the Gambling Commission anticipated such scrutiny and pre-emptively commissioned Professor Sturgis’ independent review of the GSGB. Either way, we fully expect the Gambling Commission, in its future regulatory decisions, to place significant weight on the evidence drawn from the GSGB when it becomes the Gambling Commission’s official statistics.

With new customer interaction requirements for remote operators in Great Britain in effect, we recommend all licensees (and especially online B2Cs) review the experimental findings, stay apprised of the GSGB’s further progress and closely analyse the problem gambling data that is released in light of the number of interactions they are carrying out with customers, in preparation for the GSGB becoming the Gambling Commission’s official statistics next year. After all, we know the Gambling Commission will be doing the same in future compliance assessments.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about the GSGB and how its results should be used to inform your remote customer interaction policies and procedures.

In “push to web” surveys, respondents are recruited offline (such as via another survey, or through the post), and then encouraged to go online and complete a web questionnaire.